Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-2021
Abstract
Positive Organizational Scholarship (POS) perspectives define interpersonal work experiences such as positive work relationships and high-quality connections by the mutual growth and empowerment experienced by relationship or connection partners. Listening has been implicated as a key mechanism for building such positive interpersonal work experiences, but it is unclear how listening spurs on mutual, rather than one-sided growth, in relationship and connection partners. In this paper, we argue that management education currently focuses on the intrapersonal capability of listeners to execute key verbal and non-verbal behaviors. Less emphasis is placed on the mutual experience co-created between speaker and listener and, thus, on the potential for mutual growth and empowerment. We articulate what “being relational” in the listening experience means, and use experiential learning theory to articulate how educators might create learning spaces for “being relational” through conversations between listener and speaker. Throughout the paper we contend with issues of individual and structural power asymmetries inherent in understanding listening as a relational process.
Keywords
conversation, experiential learning, high-quality connections, listening, mutuality, positive work relationships
Language
English
Publication Title
Management Learning
Rights
This article is protected by copyright and reuse is restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses. Users may also download and save a local copy of an article accessed in an institutional repository for the user's personal reference. Contact publisher for reuse permission.
Recommended Citation
Hinz, J., Stephens, J. P., & Van Oosten, E. B. (2022). Toward a pedagogy of connection: A critical view of being relational in listening. Management Learning, 53(1), 76-97.
Included in
Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Interpersonal and Small Group Communication Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons, Social Psychology Commons
Manuscript Version
Accepted Manuscript